

We tried playing the game on a very similarly specced gaming PC from around 2012, and barely managed 30 FPS on sub-HD resolutions. Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 670 2GB/AMD Radeon HD 7870 2GB or better

Processor: Intel Core i5-2400/AMD FX-8320 or better The minimum requirements sound relatively fair: Unfortunately, there’s nothing you can do about it other than fine-tune the settings, which is what we’re here for! What are the minimum requirements to play Ark? The size of Ark’s development and QA teams is unknown at this point, but the game hasn’t been supported to the degree of an AAA title like The Witcher 3 or Resident Evil 3. So what gives? Ark’s poor performance stems from problems in its code, as it’s not optimized enough to run smoother. My PC can run any modern game, including the remake of Resident Evil 3, Doom Eternal, Grand Theft Auto 5, and Dark Souls 3 at 4K with maximum details at 60 FPS, and these games arguably look a whole lot better. Oddly, the game itself isn’t anything like the Crysis of this generation - its graphics aren’t particularly advanced.

One time it’s buttery smooth, and then you turn the camera and it’s a stutter-fest. On a brand-new gaming PC running Intel’s tenth-gen 10900K CPU overclocked to 5.3 GHz, 16 GB of 4266 MHz RAM, and two Titan Xp GPUs, the game varies between 40 and 55 FPS - not exactly a fun experience. On 4K Epic settings, Ark brings even the most powerful PCs to their knees. Ark is a highly unoptimized game, as even high-end hardware often isn’t able to achieve a smooth 60 FPS or even a stable 30 FPS. Many users struggle with Ark’s performance stutters, low FPS (frames per second), and graphical glitches.
